On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses > > > an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only > > > a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP > > > DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs. > > > Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches > > mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just > > requested Matt to make in another thread. > > Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed > like there was lots of stuff going on. The issues raised by Sekhar and Santosh were reasonably minor and will be addressed. My major concern is that the dependency on some api to fetch dmaengine driver SG limitations is not resolved. That's being discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/10/432 If I don't get confirmation from Vinod soon, I'll just take a stab at implementing the callbacks he mentioned in that thread. Static per-channel caps don't provide the information needed by a client driver the uses the EDMA DMAC. Alternatively, we can go back to the hack that looks at the edma phandle and hardcodes the mmc SG limits to magic values, but that's just plain ugly. I could live with it temporarily if we can't get the dmaengine api resolved until 3.10...dunno if others can though. ;) -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
