At 11/01/2012 02:29 AM, David Rientjes Wrote: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c >> index af1a177..5d7731e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/node.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c >> @@ -614,23 +614,23 @@ static ssize_t show_node_state(struct device *dev, >> { __ATTR(name, 0444, show_node_state, NULL), state } >> >> static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = { >> - _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE), >> - _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE), >> - _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY), >> - _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU), >> + [N_POSSIBLE] = _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE), >> + [N_ONLINE] = _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE), >> + [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY), >> #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM >> - _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY), >> + [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY), >> #endif >> + [N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU), >> }; >> > > Why change the index for N_CPU? N_CPU > N_HIGH_MEMORY We use this array to create attr file in sysfs. So changing the index for N_CPU doesn't cause any other problem. Thanks Wen Congyang > >> static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = { >> - &node_state_attr[0].attr.attr, >> - &node_state_attr[1].attr.attr, >> - &node_state_attr[2].attr.attr, >> - &node_state_attr[3].attr.attr, >> + &node_state_attr[N_POSSIBLE].attr.attr, >> + &node_state_attr[N_ONLINE].attr.attr, >> + &node_state_attr[N_NORMAL_MEMORY].attr.attr, >> #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM >> - &node_state_attr[4].attr.attr, >> + &node_state_attr[N_HIGH_MEMORY].attr.attr, >> #endif >> + &node_state_attr[N_CPU].attr.attr, >> NULL >> }; >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html