On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > > > way that drivers can use it - there will be drivers (perhaps not display > > > ones) that have a known power sequence and which could benefit from the > > > ability to use library code to implement it based on the user simply > > > supplying named resources. > > > > Not sure I understand what you mean, but things should be working this way > > already - regulators and PWMs are acquired by name using the standard > > regulator_get() and pwm_get() functions. GPIOs do not, AFAIK, have a way > > to be referenced by name so their number is used instead. > > Right, but the sequencing for enabling them is currently open coded in > each driver. Mmm then I'm afraid I don't see what you wanted to say initially - could you elaborate? Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
