On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:23:06PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > I understand the logic behind handling powering sequences in the device > > driver, but as we discussed for some classes of devices this might just > > not > > scale. I don't know how many different panels (each with different > > powering > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > way that drivers can use it - there will be drivers (perhaps not display > ones) that have a known power sequence and which could benefit from the > ability to use library code to implement it based on the user simply > supplying named resources. Not sure I understand what you mean, but things should be working this way already - regulators and PWMs are acquired by name using the standard regulator_get() and pwm_get() functions. GPIOs do not, AFAIK, have a way to be referenced by name so their number is used instead. Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
