On Thursday 13 September 2012 05:33:56 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:27:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > > > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that > > > was > > > kindly provided about the last version. > > > > > > I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start > > > looking for a maintainer who would be willing to merge this into > > > his/her tree (I am especially thinking about the power framework > > > maintainers, since this is where the code is right now. > > > > > > The other alternative is for you to maintain this going forward; I > > believe that would be as simple as: > > > > * Create a patch to add yourself to MAINTAINERS for the > > drivers/power/power_seq/ directory. > > > > * Get a kernel.org account, push this patch to a branch there, and add > > the branch into linux-next. > > > > * Send a pull request to Linus at the appropriate time. > > > > * Ongoing: Accept any patches, perform any maintenance required, etc. > > > > Does anyone see any issue with Alexandre doing this? Nobody else has > > volunteered yet:-) > > > Yup, looks like the best way. I am fine this way too - it will just take some time for me to get ready as I will need to get my GPG key signed by some kernel developers first (that's what I forgot to do during the last LinuxCon!). I know a few here so it should not be too hard to get them drunk and sign my key, but I don't expect to be ready for the 3.7 merge window. Would anybody be concerned by this delay? By the meantime I can also make a branch available somewhere. Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
