On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:57 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that was > kindly provided about the last version. > > I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start looking for > a maintainer who would be willing to merge this into his/her tree (I am > especially thinking about the power framework maintainers, since this is where > the code is right now. The second patch in this series enables the pwm_backlight > driver to be used with the device tree, without relying on board-dependent > callbacks to support complex power sequences. We also plan to use power > sequences in other Tegra drivers, and other people have expressed interest in > this work during earlier reviews. See for instance > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-August/018532.html > > and > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/6/270 > > There is probably some more details to fix and improve, but the current shape > should be enough to know if we want this and where - therefore any sign from > a maintainer would be greatly appreciated! I want to reiterate my opinion that I think power sequences in DT data is the wrong way to go. Powering sequences are device specific issues and should be handled in the device driver. But I also think that power sequences inside the drivers would probably be useful. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
