Hi, On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:17:03PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> >>>>> On 9/6/2012 8:25 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> >>>>>> The mailbox register for usb otg in omap is present in control module. >> >>>>>> On detection of any events VBUS or ID, this register should be written >> >>>>>> to send the notification to musb core. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Till we have a separate control module driver to write to control module, >> >>>>>> omap2430 will handle the register writes to control module by itself. So >> >>>>>> a new address space to represent this control module register is added >> >>>>>> to usb_otg_hs. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx> >> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >> >>>>>> --- >> >>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 5 +++++ >> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c >> >>>>>> index 242aee4..02341bc 100644 >> >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c >> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c >> >>>>>> @@ -5890,6 +5890,11 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap44xx_usb_otg_hs_addrs[] = { >> >>>>>> .pa_end = 0x4a0ab003, >> >>>>>> .flags = ADDR_TYPE_RT >> >>>>>> }, >> >>>>>> + { >> >>>>>> + .pa_start = 0x4a00233c, >> >>>>>> + .pa_end = 0x4a00233f, >> >>>>>> + .flags = ADDR_TYPE_RT >> >>>>>> + }, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I do not have any objection/comment here, but I believe this is control >> >>>>> module address space required for USB module, right? >> >>>>> I am not sure this is right way of accessing control module space. >> >>>>> Actually Control Module Access required for drivers is one of the >> >>>>> blocking issue we have currently. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Also there was some effort put up by 'Konstantine' to convert Control >> >>>>> module to MFD driver, I haven't seen any further update on it. But it >> >>>>> would be good to check with him. >> >>>> >> >>>> this was an agreement with Benoit since we already lost a couple merge >> >>>> windows for this patchset. We agreed to wait until -rc4 for SCM driver >> >>>> and if it wasn't ready, we'd go ahead with this and SCM author would fix >> >>>> it up on a patch converting users to new SCM driver. >> >>> >> >>> Tony, can I get your Acked-by to this patch so I can take it together >> >>> with the rest of the series ? Thanks >> >>> >> >>> ps: I'll apply this to my 'musb' branch which is immutable, so it's safe >> >>> to merge it into your tree once I apply. >> >> >> >> It would be best if this got acked by Benoit and Paul as they may >> >> have some other patches queued up. I'll ack if they ack ;) >> > >> > Benoit, care to ack this patch ??? >> >> Gosh, that's hard to ack something like that :-) > > btw, that's not different than what's already in tree, the only > difference is that now hwmod knows about it... > >> But considering that the control module driver is not there yet, I have >> no choice but accepting that one if we want to have the functionality >> we've been waiting for years. >> >> Could you just update the patch with a big disclaimer on top of the >> address range to explain that this should not belong here and will be >> removed ASAP, when the proper driver will be done. > > sure, that's doable... Kishon, can you do this ASAP ? I want to send my > pull requests tomorrow at the latest. Sure. Will send now. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html