Le Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:48:32 +0200,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> this is really difficult here ;) I thought I could just add PINCTRL_DOVE
> to MACH_DOVE inside ARCH_MVEBU, PINCTRL_KIRKWOOD to MACH_KIRKWOOD, aso.
> But there is a common MACH_ARMADA_370_XP for both 370 and XP obviously.
>
> If it is ok for you I will add both PINCTRL_ stubs to the Kconfig and
> you work it out if you ever have two distinct MACHs? Or it could remain
> selectable in pinctrl/Kconfig but that will then be different with the
> other stubs.
In order to keep the consistency with other SoC families, maybe we can
split the 370 and XP options in two separate MACH_ARMADA_370 and
MACH_ARMADA_XP. So, in the ideal world, once all Marvell EBU SoCs are
converted to DT+mach-mvebu, we should have:
*) arch/arm/Kconfig defines MACH_MVEBU
*) arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig defines MACH_KIRKWOOD, MACH_DOVE,
MACH_MX78X00, MACH_ARMADA_370, MACH_ARMADA_XP, MACH_ORION5X
Then, an user is free to build a single kernel image that supports all,
or a selection of the supported Marvell EBU SoCs.
Would that be ok with you?
If that's fine with you, then I would prefer if we keep the single
MACH_ARMADA_370_XP symbol for now, so that your pinctrl set of patches
does not depend on something else. We would do the small Kconfig option
refactoring as a follow-up set of patches. Thoughts?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
