Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] I2C: SIS964: Bus driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jean,

>
> What is the rationale for not adding support for the new chip to
> i2c-sis630 then? That would probably be a lot easier to review.
>

I was afraid that adding SIS964 support to i2c-sis630 would lead
to confusion.

I can try to submit a patch for i2c-sis630. In this case, do you think
we should keep the 630 name or change it to something else to
avoid misunderstanding ?


>
> This split makes little sense. Integration should come with the driver,
> otherwise even build-testing is impossible.
>

Sorry for that. As the patch V1 was rather big, I was hesitating for
the same reason but posted it split. I'll "unsplit" for the V3 (unless
i2c-sis630 patch).


Amaury Decrême
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux