On 06/20/2012 06:23 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Add the policy for regulator DT such that if device have multiple > regulator and its binding contains a child node that describes each > regulator then each regulator child node must have the property > "regulator-compatible" which matches with regulator name of their > hardware counterparts. > Modify the DT documentation of regulator devices to reflect this > policy. > > Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx> I'm personally OK with this change as-is, so Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I suspect Mark may want the wording in regulators.txt modified a little to allow each regulator binding to choose whether they want the regulator child nodes identified using the new regulator-compatible property, or whether they want each instantiated as an actual device, using regular device instantiation techniques. That could always be a later patch though, and I'll leave this aspect up to Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
