On 04/27/2011 09:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> Lastly, I'm not entirely convinced about moving this stuff. I've not >>> seen anything which explains why this is being done or what benefit it >>> is supposedly bringing. >> >> Does the same logic apply to the "arch" directory in actual source code? >> All those subdirectories under it _could_ be at the top level. For >> that matter, "filesystems" could all be at the top level too. It's >> cluttered, so I'm trying to collate. > > I think it's fine so long as we don't go overboard with it (i.e., too much > of it). I think I need to break that patch up into a series of smaller patches, each moving one or two architectures, and moving/tweaking their 00-INDEX summary line (which oddly is the sticking point due to ease of bikeshedding). Lemme finish reinstalling my laptop, then I'll repost broken up with the feedback I've gotten so far incorporated. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
