On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:40:52 -0500 Rob Landley wrote: > On 04/27/2011 04:31 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:53:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > Intel doesn't make motherboards either. (There is an entity ultimately > responsible for the arm design, the URL was an attempt to indicate that > entity.) sure they do. I've owned several of them: http://www.intel.com/products/motherboard/index.htm?iid=gg_prod-en_US+mb > > Lastly, I'm not entirely convinced about moving this stuff. I've not > > seen anything which explains why this is being done or what benefit it > > is supposedly bringing. > > Does the same logic apply to the "arch" directory in actual source code? > All those subdirectories under it _could_ be at the top level. For > that matter, "filesystems" could all be at the top level too. It's > cluttered, so I'm trying to collate. I think it's fine so long as we don't go overboard with it (i.e., too much of it). > The Documentation directory is a mess right now. A lot of the > information it contains is specific to a given hardware platform, which > probably isn't of interest to people who aren't using that hardware > platform. There's plenty of documentation that's _not_ target-specific, > so collecting together the stuff that IS target-specific seems like an > obvious cleanup to me. > > Is your objection that Documentation isn't cluttered enough to warrant > cleanup? Or that mirroring "arch" a level up is a surprising cleanup to > make? --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
