On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 07:26:16PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Well, the async fallback (using cryptd) occurs only when a kernel-mode FPU > section in process context is interrupted by a hardirq and at the end of it a > softirq also tries to use kernel-mode FPU. It's generally a rare case but also > a terrible implementation that is really bad for performance; this should never It may not be rare if the kernel is busy doing bidirectional TX/RX with crypto. The process context will be the TX-side encrypting while the softirq context will do RX-side decryption. > have been implemented this way. I am planning to fix it so that softirqs on x86 Sure but it's way better than falling back to the C implementation on the RX-side. > will always be able to use the FPU, like they can on some of the other arches > like arm64 and riscv. That's great news. Thanks! -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
