Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] tpm, tpm_tis: Introduce TPM_IOC_SET_LOCALITY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat Nov 2, 2024 at 11:02 AM EET, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Same for the ioctl() [as well as the read-write sysfs node]: looking
> at the code (patch 19/20) it doesn't seem like user space needs to be
> able to modify this at all, at least not for the patch set as
> presented. So for now, can we just stick with making the sysfs node
> read-only?

Short answer: I have no idea. I would not mind that but neither
the commit message for TPM give a clue on this. Actually, I *do
not care* if it is RO and RW but I'm neither good at guessing
random shit.

I haad to assume it was *needed* for reason that I do not know
given that sysfs attribute was RW.

BR, Jarkko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux