On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 13:01 +0000, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > I don't see significant improvements about LSX here, so I prefer to > > just use the generic version to avoid complexity (I remember Linus > > said the whole of __vdso_getrandom is not very useful). > > I'm inclined to feel the same way, at least for now. Let's just go with > one implementation -- the generic one -- and then we can see if > optimization really makes sense later. I suspect the large speedup we're > already getting from being in the vDSO is already sufficient for > purposes. Ok I'll drop the 2nd and 3rd patches in the next version. But I'm puzzled why the LSX implementation isn't much faster, maybe I made some mistake in it? -- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
