> I don't see significant improvements about LSX here, so I prefer to > just use the generic version to avoid complexity (I remember Linus > said the whole of __vdso_getrandom is not very useful). I'm inclined to feel the same way, at least for now. Let's just go with one implementation -- the generic one -- and then we can see if optimization really makes sense later. I suspect the large speedup we're already getting from being in the vDSO is already sufficient for purposes. Regards, Jason
