Re: [PATCH v22 1/4] mm: add MAP_DROPPABLE for designating always lazily freeable mappings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10.07.24 05:27, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 09.07.24 15:05, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
The vDSO getrandom() implementation works with a buffer allocated with a
new system call that has certain requirements:

- It shouldn't be written to core dumps.
    * Easy: VM_DONTDUMP.
- It should be zeroed on fork.
    * Easy: VM_WIPEONFORK.

- It shouldn't be written to swap.
    * Uh-oh: mlock is rlimited.
    * Uh-oh: mlock isn't inherited by forks.

It turns out that the vDSO getrandom() function has three really nice
characteristics that we can exploit to solve this problem:

1) Due to being wiped during fork(), the vDSO code is already robust to
     having the contents of the pages it reads zeroed out midway through
     the function's execution.

2) In the absolute worst case of whatever contingency we're coding for,
     we have the option to fallback to the getrandom() syscall, and
     everything is fine.

3) The buffers the function uses are only ever useful for a maximum of
     60 seconds -- a sort of cache, rather than a long term allocation.

These characteristics mean that we can introduce VM_DROPPABLE, which
has the following semantics:

a) It never is written out to swap.
b) Under memory pressure, mm can just drop the pages (so that they're
     zero when read back again).
c) It is inherited by fork.
d) It doesn't count against the mlock budget, since nothing is locked.

This is fairly simple to implement, with the one snag that we have to
use 64-bit VM_* flags, but this shouldn't be a problem, since the only
consumers will probably be 64-bit anyway.

This way, allocations used by vDSO getrandom() can use:

      VM_DROPPABLE | VM_DONTDUMP | VM_WIPEONFORK | VM_NORESERVE

And there will be no problem with using memory when not in use, not
wiping on fork(), coredumps, or writing out to swap.

In order to let vDSO getrandom() use this, expose these via mmap(2) as
MAP_DROPPABLE.

Finally, the provided self test ensures that this is working as desired.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>


I'll try to think of some corner cases we might be missing.

BTW, do we have to handle the folio_set_swapbacked() in sort_folio() as well?


	/* dirty lazyfree */
	if (type == LRU_GEN_FILE && folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
		success = lru_gen_del_folio(lruvec, folio, true);
		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!success, folio);
		folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
		lruvec_add_folio_tail(lruvec, folio);
		return true;
	}

Maybe more difficult because we don't have a VMA here ... hmm

IIUC, we have to make sure that no folio_set_swapbacked() would ever get
performed on these folios, correct?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux