On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 01:37:33AM +0800, Jerry Shih wrote: > On Nov 21, 2023, at 21:14, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:55:07PM +0800, Jerry Shih wrote: > >> Sorry, I just use my `internal` qemu with vector-crypto and rva22 patches. > >> > >> The public qemu haven't supported rva22 profiles. Here is the qemu patch[1] for > >> that. But here is the discussion why the qemu doesn't export these > >> `named extensions`(e.g. Zicclsm). > >> I try to add Zicclsm in DT in the v2 patch set. Maybe we will have more discussion > >> about the rva22 profiles in kernel DT. > > > > Please do, that'll be fun! Please take some time to read what the > > profiles spec actually defines Zicclsm fore before you send those patches > > though. I think you might come to find you have misunderstood what it > > means - certainly I did the first time I saw it! > > From the rva22 profile: "rva22" is not a profile. As I pointed out to Eric, this is defined in the RVA22U64 profile (and the RVA20U64 one, but that is effectively a moot point). The profile descriptions for these only specify "the ISA features available to user-mode execution environments", so it is not suitable for use in any other context. > This requires misaligned support for all regular load and store instructions (including > scalar and ``vector``) > > The spec includes the explicit `vector` keyword. > So, I still think we could use Zicclsm checking for these vector-crypto implementations. In userspace, if Zicclsm was exported somewhere, that would be a valid argument. Even for userspace, the hwprobe flags probably provide more information though, since the firmware emulation is insanely slow. > My proposed patch is just a simple patch which only update the DT document and > update the isa string parser for Zicclsm. Zicclsm has no meaning outside of user mode, so it's not suitable for use in that context. Other "features" defined in the profiles spec might be suitable for inclusion, but it'll be a case-by-case basis. > If it's still not recommend to use Zicclsm > checking, I will turn to use `RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_*` instead. Palmer has commented on the rest, so no need for me :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
