Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] sched: cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:33 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:22:06 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:07:58 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > > > Peter/Ingo, any objections to stashing this in tip/sched/core?
> > >
> > > Can you please look into it? So we'll have enough time to act (in
> > > case...) during this kernel.
> > >
> > > We already missed one kernel...
> >
> > We really need this in linux-next by the end of the week. PTAL.
>
> Peter, could you please take a look? Linux doesn't have an API for
> basic, common sense IRQ distribution on AMD systems. It's important :(

FWIW, it's already been in linux-next since mid-December through the
bitmap branch, and no issues were reported so far.

Thanks,
Yury



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux