On 22/01/23 14:57, Tariq Toukan wrote: > On 21/01/2023 6:24, Yury Norov wrote: >> >> This series was supposed to be included in v6.2, but that didn't happen. It >> spent enough in -next without any issues, so I hope we'll finally see it >> in v6.3. >> >> I believe, the best way would be moving it with scheduler patches, but I'm >> OK to try again with bitmap branch as well. > > Now that Yury dropped several controversial bitmap patches form the PR, > the rest are mostly in sched, or new API that's used by sched. > > Valentin, what do you think? Can you take it to your sched branch? > I would if I had one :-) Peter/Ingo, any objections to stashing this in tip/sched/core?
