Hi Jacob, Thanks for the review! On Tue. 29 Nov. 2022 at 09:23, Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Vincent > > Mailhol > > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 4:06 PM > > To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jakub Kicinski > > <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet > > <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Arnaud Ebalard > > <arno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Srujana Challa <schalla@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kurt Kanzenbach > > <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>; Florian Fainelli > > <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>; Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>; Michael Chan > > <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@xxxxxxx>; > > Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Yisen Zhuang > > <yisen.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>; Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L > > <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Linu > > Cherian <lcherian@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Geetha sowjanya <gakula@xxxxxxxxxxx>; > > Jerin Jacob <jerinj@xxxxxxxxxxx>; hariprasad <hkelam@xxxxxxxxxxx>; > > Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Taras Chornyi > > <tchornyi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Leon > > Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>; Petr > > Machata <petrm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; > > Shannon Nelson <snelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; drivers@xxxxxxxxxxx; Ariel Elior > > <aelior@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Manish Chopra <manishc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Jonathan > > Lemon <jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx>; Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@xxxxxx>; > > Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>; Vadim Pasternak > > <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shalom Toledo <shalomt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux- > > crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oss-drivers@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Jiri Pirko > > <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Hao Chen > > <chenhao288@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Guangbin Huang > > <huangguangbin2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > Shijith Thotton <sthotton@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Vincent Mailhol > > <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 2/4] net: devlink: remove > > devlink_info_driver_name_put() > > > > Now that the core sets the driver name attribute, drivers are not > > supposed to call devlink_info_driver_name_put() anymore. Remove it. > > > > You could combine this patch with the previous one so that in the event of a cherry-pick its not possible to have this function while the core inserts the driver name automatically. > > I think that also makes it very clear that there are no remaining in-tree drivers still calling the function. > > I don't have a strong preference if we prefer it being separated. The first patch is already pretty long. I do not expect this to be cherry-picked because it does not fix any existing bug (and if people really want to cherry pick, then they just have to cherry pick both). On the contrary, splitting makes it easier to review, I think. Unless the maintainers as me to squash, I want to keep it as-is. Yours sincerely, Vincent Mailhol
