> On 9/6/22 19:13, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:24:49PM +0800, Neal Liu wrote: > >> > >> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger(struct > aspeed_hace_dev *hace_dev, > >> struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req; > >> struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req); > >> > >> - AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:0x%x, digest_dma:0x%x, > length:0x%x\n", > >> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:%zu, digest_dma:%zu, length:%zu\n", > >> hash_engine->src_dma, hash_engine->digest_dma, > >> hash_engine->src_length); > > > > Shouldn't we use %pad instead of %zu for dma_addr_t (you'll also need > > to pass in a dma_addr_t pointer instead of the value)? > > That sounds correct. > I only looked at the size_t parts... True. I'll revise it and send next patch, thanks.
