On 9/6/22 19:13, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:24:49PM +0800, Neal Liu wrote: >> >> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger(struct aspeed_hace_dev *hace_dev, >> struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req; >> struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req); >> >> - AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:0x%x, digest_dma:0x%x, length:0x%x\n", >> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:%zu, digest_dma:%zu, length:%zu\n", >> hash_engine->src_dma, hash_engine->digest_dma, >> hash_engine->src_length); > > Shouldn't we use %pad instead of %zu for dma_addr_t (you'll also > need to pass in a dma_addr_t pointer instead of the value)? That sounds correct. I only looked at the size_t parts... -- ~Randy
