On 2022/9/2 2:09, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:00:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 05:04:08PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:29:42AM +0800, Kai Ye wrote: >>>> Update documentation describing sysfs node that could help to >>>> configure isolation strategy for users in the user space. And >>>> describing sysfs node that could read the device isolated state. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce >>>> index 08f2591138af..e09fd160d3fa 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce >>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce >>>> @@ -19,6 +19,32 @@ Contact: linux-accelerators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Description: Available instances left of the device >>>> Return -ENODEV if uacce_ops get_available_instances is not provided >>>> >>>> +What: /sys/class/uacce/<dev_name>/isolate_strategy >>>> +Date: Jul 2022 >>> July was a while ago, you sent this patch in August :( >>> >> Does the date in the sysfs documentation files serve any purpose besides making >> people have to update their patchsets every month? >> >> The kernel version number would be more useful to readers of the documentation, >> and it wouldn't have to be updated quite as often. > True, I have seen people use that instead, or no date at all, I don't > require it. But if you do put the field in there, it should at least be > correct :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h > . > I have fixed the date in version v8 thanks Kai
