On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:00:40AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 05:04:08PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:29:42AM +0800, Kai Ye wrote: > > > Update documentation describing sysfs node that could help to > > > configure isolation strategy for users in the user space. And > > > describing sysfs node that could read the device isolated state. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce > > > index 08f2591138af..e09fd160d3fa 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-uacce > > > @@ -19,6 +19,32 @@ Contact: linux-accelerators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Description: Available instances left of the device > > > Return -ENODEV if uacce_ops get_available_instances is not provided > > > > > > +What: /sys/class/uacce/<dev_name>/isolate_strategy > > > +Date: Jul 2022 > > > > July was a while ago, you sent this patch in August :( > > > > Does the date in the sysfs documentation files serve any purpose besides making > people have to update their patchsets every month? > > The kernel version number would be more useful to readers of the documentation, > and it wouldn't have to be updated quite as often. True, I have seen people use that instead, or no date at all, I don't require it. But if you do put the field in there, it should at least be correct :) thanks, greg k-h
