Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2500/AST2600 HACE reset definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/29/2022 1:49 AM, Neal Liu wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
index 9ff4f6e4558c..6e040f7c3426 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
@@ -46,11 +46,12 @@
  #define ASPEED_RESET_MCTP		1
  #define ASPEED_RESET_ADC		2
  #define ASPEED_RESET_JTAG_MASTER	3
-#define ASPEED_RESET_MIC		4
+#define ASPEED_RESET_HACE		4

I did not ack such change. This is a significant change from previous
version, invalidating my previous ack.

This breaks the ABI, so NAK without proper explanation why ABI break
is accepted.

I changed the original define (MIC) into different value (see below diff), and
add a new define for HACE.
How does that break the ABI? I'll be appreciated if you can explain it more
details.
And sorry for not remove ack with new change.

Yes, this breaks ABI. Previously the ASPEED_RESET_MIC define had value of 4,
now it has value of something else.

Got your point. I'll re-define HACE without modifying ABI.
Thanks for your suggestion.


As per HW manuals, new def is correct for AST2500, but not for AST2400.

AST2500:
SCU04[4] = HACE
SCU04[18] = MIC

AST2400:
SCU04[4] = MIC
SCU04[18] = HACE

The header file is shared between AST2400 and AST2500 (aspeed-g4.dtsi
and aspeed-g5.dtsi), which needs to be split into separate header files
given the collision.

Also, It will be better to split AST2500 and AST2600 changes in separate
patches.

Regards,
Dhananjay




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux