On Tue 13 Apr 14:30 CDT 2021, Thara Gopinath wrote: > > > On 4/5/21 6:32 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Thu 25 Feb 12:27 CST 2021, Thara Gopinath wrote: > > > > > rf4309 is the specification that uses aes ccm algorithms with IPsec > > > security packets. Add a submode to identify rfc4309 ccm(aes) algorithm > > > in the crypto driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/crypto/qce/common.h | 7 +++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h b/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h > > > index 3bc244bcca2d..3ffe719b79e4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h > > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h > > > @@ -51,9 +51,11 @@ > > > #define QCE_MODE_CCM BIT(12) > > > #define QCE_MODE_MASK GENMASK(12, 8) > > > +#define QCE_MODE_CCM_RFC4309 BIT(13) > > > + > > > /* cipher encryption/decryption operations */ > > > -#define QCE_ENCRYPT BIT(13) > > > -#define QCE_DECRYPT BIT(14) > > > +#define QCE_ENCRYPT BIT(14) > > > +#define QCE_DECRYPT BIT(15) > > > > Can't we move these further up, so that next time we want to add > > something it doesn't require that we also move the ENC/DEC bits? > > Yes I will change it to BIT(30) and BIT(31) > > > > > > #define IS_DES(flags) (flags & QCE_ALG_DES) > > > #define IS_3DES(flags) (flags & QCE_ALG_3DES) > > > @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@ > > > #define IS_CTR(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_CTR) > > > #define IS_XTS(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_XTS) > > > #define IS_CCM(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_CCM) > > > +#define IS_CCM_RFC4309(mode) ((mode) & QCE_MODE_CCM_RFC4309) > > > > While leaving room for the typical macro issues, none of the other > > macros wrap the argument in parenthesis. Please follow the style of the > > driver, and perhaps follow up with a cleanup patch that just wraps them > > all in parenthesis? > > This does throw up a checkpatch warning if I don't wrap "mode" in > parenthesis. How about I keep this for now and I will follow up with a clean > up for rest of the macros later ? > I don't have a problem with this approach. Regards, Bjorn > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > > > #define IS_ENCRYPT(dir) (dir & QCE_ENCRYPT) > > > #define IS_DECRYPT(dir) (dir & QCE_DECRYPT) > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > -- > Warm Regards > Thara
