Re: [PATCH 1/1] inside-secure irq balance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:01:34AM +0200, Sven Auhagen wrote:
>
> Alright, that makes sense, thank you.
> 
> As I said in my second email yesterday, it is just a hint and not binding.
> I run some tests and here is what happens when I disable CPU3 on my 4 Core MCBin:

I don't think we should be adding policy logic like this into
individual drivers.  If the kernel should be doing this at all
it should be done in the IRQ layer.  The alternative is to do
it in user-space through irqbalance.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux