On 2020/5/25 15:36, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Could you help me to make the sentence better? > > How do you think about a wording variant like the following? > > So the system will crash when this memory will be used again. > Uh, it's much better, thanks. > >>> * You proposed to move a call of the function “crypto_finalize_skcipher_request”. >>> How does this change fit to the mentioned position? >>> >> The resources which need to be freed is not used anymore, but the pointers >> of these resources may be changed in the function >> "crypto_finalize_skcipher_request", so free these resources before call the >> function is suitable. > > Another alternative: > The resources which need to be cleaned up are not used any more. > But the pointers of these resources may be changed in the > function “crypto_finalize_skcipher_request”. > Thus release specific resources before calling this function. > Oh great! Thanks. > Regards, > Markus > -- --- Regards, Longpeng(Mike)
