On 2019/10/25 17:33, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 09:24, Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Warning is found by the code analysis tool: >> "Redundant condition: accel_dev->is_vf" >> >> So remove the redundant condition accel_dev->is_vf. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_dev_mgr.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_dev_mgr.c b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_dev_mgr.c >> index 2d06409bd3c4..b54b8850fe20 100644 >> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_dev_mgr.c >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_dev_mgr.c >> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int adf_devmgr_add_dev(struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev, >> atomic_set(&accel_dev->ref_count, 0); >> >> /* PF on host or VF on guest */ >> - if (!accel_dev->is_vf || (accel_dev->is_vf && !pf)) { >> + if (!accel_dev->is_vf || !pf) { > > I disagree with this change. There is no bug here, and the way the > condition is formulated self-documents the code, i.e., > > IF NOT is_vf > OR (is_vf BUT NOT pf) > > Using an automated tool to reduce every boolean expression to its > minimal representation doesn't seem that useful to me, since the > compiler is perfectly capable of doing that when generating the object > code. > ok, thanks, this modify just fix warning, and make code simple. > > > >> struct vf_id_map *map; >> >> list_for_each(itr, &accel_table) { >> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ void adf_devmgr_rm_dev(struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev, >> struct adf_accel_dev *pf) >> { >> mutex_lock(&table_lock); >> - if (!accel_dev->is_vf || (accel_dev->is_vf && !pf)) { >> + if (!accel_dev->is_vf || !pf) { >> id_map[accel_dev->accel_id] = 0; >> num_devices--; >> } else if (accel_dev->is_vf && pf) { >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > . >