> >> Yes. Code and data with static linkage will just be optimized away by > >> the compiler if the CONFIG_xx option is not enabled, so all you need > >> to guard are the actual statements, function calls etc. > >> > > Ok, makes sense. Then I'll just config out the relevant function bodies > > and assume the compiler will do the rest ... > > > > No need to config out function bodies when they are static. > Well, I got a complaint from someone that my driver updates for adding PCIE support wouldn't compile properly on a platform without a PCI(E) subsystem. So I figure I do have to config out the references to PCI specific function calls to fix that. Or are you just referring to bodies of static subfunctions that are no longer being called? Would the compiler skip those entirely? > If not, it's better to group then in a C file and associate that file > to the config symbol through Makefile > > Christophe Regards, Pascal van Leeuwen Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Inside Secure www.insidesecure.com
