On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > N'ack. As I mentioned in the last email, this really isn't okay, and > mostly defeats the purpose of Zinc in the first place, adding > complexity in a discombobulated half-baked way. Your proposal seems to > be the worst of all worlds. Having talked to lots of people about the > design of Zinc at this point to very positive reception, I'm going to > move forward with submitting v9, once I rebase with the required > changes for Eric's latest merge. Do you have any actual technical reasons for rejecting this apart from your apparent hatred of the existing crypto API? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
