On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:01:57AM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Gilad,
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Add bindings for CryptoCell instance in the SoC.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your patch!
> >>
> >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> >> > @@ -528,6 +528,14 @@
> >> > status = "disabled";
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > + arm_cc630p: crypto@e6601000 {
> >> > + compatible = "arm,cryptocell-630p-ree";
> >> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >>
> >> I believe the #interrupt-cells property is not needed.
> >>
> >> > + reg = <0x0 0xe6601000 0 0x1000>;
> >> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 229>;
> >> > + };
> >>
> >> The rest looks good, but I cannot verify the register block.
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > i2c3: i2c@e66d0000 {
> >> > #address-cells = <1>;
> >> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > Thanks, I have applied this after dropping the #interrupt-cells property.
>
> Thanks you!
>
> Alas, it will not work without the clk patch (the previous one in the
> series) so they need to be
> taken or dropped together.
I think its fine if it does not yet work.
But not if its causes things that previously worked to stop working.
