On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Gilad,
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Add bindings for CryptoCell instance in the SoC.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
>> > @@ -528,6 +528,14 @@
>> > status = "disabled";
>> > };
>> >
>> > + arm_cc630p: crypto@e6601000 {
>> > + compatible = "arm,cryptocell-630p-ree";
>> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>
>> I believe the #interrupt-cells property is not needed.
>>
>> > + reg = <0x0 0xe6601000 0 0x1000>;
>> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 229>;
>> > + };
>>
>> The rest looks good, but I cannot verify the register block.
>>
>> > +
>> > i2c3: i2c@e66d0000 {
>> > #address-cells = <1>;
>> > #size-cells = <0>;
>
> Thanks, I have applied this after dropping the #interrupt-cells property.
Thanks you!
Alas, it will not work without the clk patch (the previous one in the
series) so they need to be
taken or dropped together.
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
