Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: AF_ALG - limit mask and type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 08:41:10AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we then rather use a white list instead of a black list?
> > 
> > Most other problems however would be bugs in the template code.
> > The first thing a template does when it creates an instance is
> > to check whether the resulting algorithm would fulfil the requested
> > type/mask using crypto_check_attr_type.  So if that's not working
> > then we should fix it there as it may also be triggered via other
> > code paths that can create instances.
> 
> I think I understand that, but does user space need to utilize this logic?

I'm open to a white list as well.  But we should certainly fix
the underlying bugs rather than just papering over them as they
could come back via other channels.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux