On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:20:32PM +0000, Horia Geantă wrote: > On 10/27/2017 2:36 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote: > >> On 10/26/2017 1:01 PM, Radu Alexe wrote: > >>> This patch-set introduces a new DMA memcpy driver based on the DMA > >>> capabilities of the CAAM crypto engine. Because of this dependency the > >>> included commits target various parts of the kernel tree. > >> I don't see the patches on any of the mail lists. > >> If they are moderated, I would expect this to be mentioned in the > >> MAINTAINERS file. > >> > >>> > >>> Patch 1. > >>> Since the CAAM DMA driver is a platform driver it is enabled by a new node > >>> in the device tree. This commit adds documentation for the device tree > >>> bindings. > >>> > >>> Patch 2. > >>> This patch adds the "caam-dma" node in the fsl-ls1012a.dtsi file. > >>> > >>> Patch 3. > >>> This commit adds various capabilities in the JR driver of the CAAM that is > >>> used by the CAAM DMA driver. > >>> > >>> Patch 4. > >>> Adds the CAAM DMA memcpy driver. > >>> > >>> Patch 1 and 3 should be merged by the crypto maintainers, patch 2 by > >>> devicetree maintainers and patch 4 by the DMA maintainers. > >> I would go with all the patches through the dmaengine tree. > > > > Good call, but no one CCed dmaengine folks on this series! > > > I see dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc-ed on both cover letter and all four > patches. > It might be that the sender (Radu) is not subscribed and messages are > awaiting moderators' approval. I think vger lists are open, maybe sender has some issues with mail as they are still not in any archives.. -- ~Vinod
