On 10/27/2017 2:36 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote: >> On 10/26/2017 1:01 PM, Radu Alexe wrote: >>> This patch-set introduces a new DMA memcpy driver based on the DMA >>> capabilities of the CAAM crypto engine. Because of this dependency the >>> included commits target various parts of the kernel tree. >> I don't see the patches on any of the mail lists. >> If they are moderated, I would expect this to be mentioned in the >> MAINTAINERS file. >> >>> >>> Patch 1. >>> Since the CAAM DMA driver is a platform driver it is enabled by a new node >>> in the device tree. This commit adds documentation for the device tree >>> bindings. >>> >>> Patch 2. >>> This patch adds the "caam-dma" node in the fsl-ls1012a.dtsi file. >>> >>> Patch 3. >>> This commit adds various capabilities in the JR driver of the CAAM that is >>> used by the CAAM DMA driver. >>> >>> Patch 4. >>> Adds the CAAM DMA memcpy driver. >>> >>> Patch 1 and 3 should be merged by the crypto maintainers, patch 2 by >>> devicetree maintainers and patch 4 by the DMA maintainers. >> I would go with all the patches through the dmaengine tree. > > Good call, but no one CCed dmaengine folks on this series! > I see dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc-ed on both cover letter and all four patches. It might be that the sender (Radu) is not subscribed and messages are awaiting moderators' approval. Horia
