Am Freitag, 13. Januar 2017, 00:07:39 CET schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:05:03PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2017, 16:56:04 CET schrieb Stephan Müller: > > > > Hi Herbert, > > > > > That would mean that we would only support one IOCB. > > > > As we also need to be standards compliant, would it be appropriate to only > > support one IOCB? I think this is a significant difference to other AIO > > operations like for networking. > > Why would we be limited to one IOCB? Each IOCB would transpire into an independent, separate recvmsg invocation without an additional sendmsg/sendpage operation. Thus, in order to support multiple IOCBs, all data the multiple recvmsg invocations will operate on must be injected into the kernel beforehand. Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
