Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: aead AF_ALG - overhaul memory management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:05:03PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2017, 16:56:04 CET schrieb Stephan Müller:
> 
> Hi Herbert,
> 
> > 
> > That would mean that we would only support one IOCB.
> 
> As we also need to be standards compliant, would it be appropriate to only 
> support one IOCB? I think this is a significant difference to other AIO 
> operations like for networking.

Why would we be limited to one IOCB?
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux