Hello,
Le 02/12/2016 à 09:58, Romain Perier a écrit :
Hi,
Le 01/12/2016 à 17:27, Gregory CLEMENT a écrit :
Hi Romain,
On jeu., déc. 01 2016, Romain Perier
<romain.perier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
from the step function.
Does this patch fix a bug ot it is jsute a cleanup/improvement?
If it is a bug you should CC stable and add use the Fixes tag.
Gregory
No, it just removes a initialization that is done twice. I have checked,
it cannot overwrite the context of the operation that was previously
copied (by the for loop), so it does not fix anything.
Well, I have a second fix that depends on this one. The second fix
will be marked as "Fixes" (to be backported to stable) so it would
introduce a ordering issue. I think that I will resend a patch series
with these two patches and tag both as "Fixes". Please ignore this patch
for now.
Regards,
Romain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
