Hi Romain, On jeu., déc. 01 2016, Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM > from the step function. > Does this patch fix a bug ot it is jsute a cleanup/improvement? If it is a bug you should CC stable and add use the Fixes tag. Gregory > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c > index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644 > --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c > +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c > @@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request *req) > for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++) > writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i)); > > - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, &creq->op_tmpl); > - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, &creq->op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl)); > - > if (creq->cache_ptr) > memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET, > creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr); > -- > 2.9.3 > -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
