> -----Original Message----- > From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 7:45 AM > To: Benedetto, Salvatore <salvatore.benedetto@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Fengguang > <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [cryptodev:master 79/79] (.text+0x330de0): multiple definition > of `ecdh_shared_secret' > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:44AM +0100, Salvatore Benedetto wrote: > > > > > > The patch was based on the current tree. I just pulled. > > There is not point in moving to lib because bluetooth is about to be > > converted to kpp. > > That patch I believe will go up the bluetooth tree, so my suggestion > > is to simply accept that I fail to properly name that symbol. > > > > Renaming the symbol in net/bluetooth/ecc which I think will conflict > > with the patch where I remove it completely which, again, I believe > > will go up the BT tree. > > OK I will have no option but to revert your patches then. Please revert the last one only and I'll resend it with the symbol name fixed. I don't see why you should revert all of them. I also just sent the BT patch which was changing the symbol name anyway. Regards, Salvatore -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
