Re: [cryptodev:master 79/79] (.text+0x330de0): multiple definition of `ecdh_shared_secret'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:44AM +0100, Salvatore Benedetto wrote:
>
> 
> The patch was based on the current tree. I just pulled.
> There is not point in moving to lib because bluetooth is
> about to be converted to kpp. 
> That patch I believe will go up the bluetooth tree, so
> my suggestion is to simply accept that I fail to properly
> name that symbol.
> 
> Renaming the symbol in net/bluetooth/ecc which I think will conflict
> with the patch where I remove it completely which, again, I believe
> will go up the BT tree.

OK I will have no option but to revert your patches then.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux