Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller: Hi, > > So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a > > clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented. > > So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case. I tested ktime_get_raw_ns and it exhibits the same results as ktime_get_raw_fast_ns and RDTSC. So, I see no objections in using ktime_get_raw_ns. Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
