Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] /dev/random - a new approach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:12:07 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:

Hi Nikos,

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> >> Personally, I don't really use /dev/random, nor would I recommend it
> >> for most application programmers.  At this point, getrandom(2) really
> >> is the preferred interface unless you have some very specialized
> >> needs.
> > 
> > I fully agree. But there are use cases for /dev/random, notably as a seed
> > source for other DRNG.
> 
> Is that really the case? I believe all DRNG's use /dev/urandom anyway
> for seeding since they cannot afford indeterminate blocking. It would
> be a gain for everyone if /dev/random was the same as /dev/urandom in
> Linux.

For standard approaches, this is true. But there are regulations, notably in 
the German realm, /dev/random shall be used, at least partially (see AIS 
20/31).

Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux