Re: Could this be applied to random(4)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, 27. Mai 2016, 16:09:53 schrieb Sandy Harris:

Hi Sandy,

> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > This document describes extractors. Those extractors are intended to
> > combine *independent* sources with weak entropy.
> > 
> > None of our sources we have in add_*_randomness are independent.
> 
> No, but it would be easy to get two independent sources, interrupts
> and some sort of timer jitter thing as in my maxwell, your jitter
> driver, havege, ...

I think I would concur with you here. From my LRNG code:

static int lrng_pdrbg_seed_internal(u8 *outbuf, u32 outbuflen, bool 
fullentropy,
                                    bool drain)
{
...
        /*
         * Concatenate the output of the noise sources. This would be the
         * spot to add an entropy extractor logic if desired.
...

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux