On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, 21:38:02 schrieb Herbert Xu: > > Hi Herbert, > > >On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:19:53PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > >> All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully > >> tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested). > >> > >> Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using > >> seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now > >> use seqiv? > > > >You should use seqiv from now on. But I should update the patches > >so that seqniv is not visible to user-space. > > In this case, wouldn't xfrm_algo.c need to be changed too? I will change it once the conversion is complete. For now seqniv is identical to seqiv for kernel users so it'll continue to work. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
