Am Donnerstag, 9. Juli 2015, 07:13:30 schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, >Hi: > >This series attempts to phase out the recently introduced seqniv >generator. The reason is that the logic of seqniv should not be >implemented at the IV generator layer. Having the IV skipping >logic in seqniv means that you cannot perform encryption without >doing IV generation. > >In fact moving the IV skipping logic out of seqniv and into the >underlying rfcXXXX (e.g., rfc4106) template allows optimisations >to be made as the underlying code can often skip the IV in a more >efficient manner. > >Unfortunately we've already begun the conversion process so this >series adds a new flag CRYPTO_ALG_AEAD_NEW to indicate whether >a given algorithm has been converted to the new interface where >IV skipping is done outside of the IV generator. This flag can >be removed once the conversion is complete. All GCM implementations available on recent Intel systems successfully tested (i.e NX and CAAM not tested). Just to clarify: from a caller's perspective, using seqniv(rfc4106(gcm(aes))) is still the right invocation? Or shall I now use seqiv? > >Cheers, Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
