On 03/04/2015 06:57 AM, yjin wrote: > An alternative is moving the definitions to a ".c" file, but I don't > think it will be fundamental different. > I know I am fixing a potential error which doesn't exist now, it seems > useless for the current upstream version, we can abandon my patch. But I > still think the current implementation adds unnecessary restrictions for > its users. I think that both dma_map_sg_chained and dma_unmap_sg_chained should go away. They were added to support chained scatterlists, but as far as I verified, dma_map_sg should handle that case as well. Kim, can you confirm this? Cristian S. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
