On 2015年03月04日 02:59, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:50:51 +0800
<yanjiang.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This commit is to avoid the below warnings:
drivers/crypto/caam/sg_sw_sec4.h:88:12: warning:
'dma_map_sg_chained' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int dma_map_sg_chained(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
^
drivers/crypto/caam/sg_sw_sec4.h:104:12: warning:
'dma_unmap_sg_chained' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int dma_unmap_sg_chained(struct device *dev,
^
I'm not seeing these warnings - both caamalg.c and caamhash.c use
those functions fine.
As you said, both caamalg.c and caamhash.c use those functions, so no
warning reported.
But if a new file just wants to include "sg_sw_sec4.h", doesn't want to
use these functions, the above warnings will appear.
We can find an example in Freescale SDK 1.6:
caampkc.c includes pkc_desc.h, pkc_desc.h includes sg_sw_sec4.h, but
caampkc.c doesn't call those functions.
Without my patch, every file which includes sg_sw_sec4.h must call these
two functions in the future, I don't think it is a good idea.
Thanks!
Yanjiang
-static int dma_map_sg_chained(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+static inline int dma_map_sg_chained(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
unsigned int nents, enum dma_data_direction dir,
bool chained)
not to mention this isn't how to fix a defined but not used warning:
marking the functions inline results in different compiler output.
NACK from me.
Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
